Let me guess, you didn’t start your business so you could spend your days chasing updates and sending “Just following up on this 👀” messages.
Neither did I.
But at one point, I realized I had become that manager. The one who couldn’t take a real day off without the company slowing to a crawl. Not because I didn’t want to trust my team but because I literally couldn’t.
Let’s talk about micromanagement.
Not the fluffy, textbook kind.
The real-life kind that sneaks up on you even when your intentions are good.
Especially when you’re a startup founder trying to scale without losing your mind (or your clients).
And more importantly: how I learned the hard way that to stop micromanaging, you don’t just change your style, you change your people.
Micromanaging in Startups
There’s a common narrative that micromanagement means you’re a control freak. That micromanagers are insecure or need to feel important by supervising every move.
Sure, that might be true for some.
But for many of us in the startup world, micromanaging isn’t about ego. It’s about survival.
Here’s what happened to me.
When I started my SEO agency, I knew I needed help fast. So I hired senior specialists, people with 4 to 6 years of experience, thinking:
“Perfect. They’ve done this before. I can delegate and finally sleep at night.”
Spoiler alert: I was wrong.
Despite one-on-one calls, clear expectations, and deadlines, I still found myself having to follow up constantly.
“Hey, did we send the report?”
“Reminder: this is due today.”
“Just checking in on that client task from earlier.”
It wasn’t that they were bad people or didn’t care. But the level of ownership I expected just… wasn’t there.
So I thought, “Okay. Maybe I’m doing this backwards. If I have to explain everything anyway, why not hire someone more junior and train them from scratch?”
Guess What? That Didn’t Work Either.
I brought on entry-level hires. I simplified the tasks. And for a while, things were manageable.
Until I had a family emergency and had to step away for a few weeks.
That’s when everything slowed to a near standstill.
No one knew what to prioritize.
No one stepped up.
Because they were so used to me delegating work in the moment, they hadn’t learned how to take ownership over their work without constant supervision.
In short: I had unintentionally trained my team to wait for me to tell them what to do.
Some People Like Being Micromanaged (And That’s the Problem)
I remember a conversation I had with a former team member.
He said, “Some people actually thrive in micromanagement.”
And I said, “That’s not who I’m looking for.”
Because here’s the truth:
If I have to coach every single decision, correct every minor mistake, and remind you to meet your deadline every week, I might as well just do the work myself.
That’s not delegation. That’s babysitting.
And that’s when I hit a wall.
Not because I had a bad team, but because I had the wrong team for where I wanted to go.
Stop Micromanaging by Hiring the Right People
This is where everything clicked for me:
Micromanagement isn’t just a leadership style problem. It’s often a hiring problem.
If your team isn’t aligned with your pace, expectations, or work style, you’ll always feel the need to “just check in.”
So I changed my approach.
Instead of just hiring based on experience or skills, I started hiring based on mindset and ownership.
Here are the actual questions I now ask in interviews, and why they matter.
1. “What does micromanagement mean to you?”
And
“How do you usually respond when you’re given a lot of detailed feedback or close supervision?”
This question reveals how people interpret structure.
Some say, “I like clear instructions, it gives me direction.”
Others say, “I feel anxious. I don’t feel trusted.”
That’s when I get real with them:
“Honestly? I really don’t want to micromanage, it’s the last thing I enjoy doing. It drains me. I didn’t start this business to spend my days double-checking tasks or chasing updates.
What I want is to give you the big picture, set clear goals, and trust that you’ll take it from there, like a true owner of your work.
But the truth is, when I don’t see that happening, I feel forced to step in. Not because I want to control everything, but because I care deeply about the quality of what we’re building.
Micromanaging isn’t my leadership style, it’s a safety net I don’t want to keep using. I’m looking for people who will make it unnecessary.”
That level of transparency tends to scare away the ones who want constant guidance, and attract the ones who value autonomy.
2. “What does a productive day look like for you?”
This shows me how they manage their time and priorities.
Do they wait for assignments and tick them off like a list?
Or do they structure their day based on goals and impact?
If someone says, “I check my calendar and see what tasks were assigned,” that’s fine, but not ideal.
If they say, “I review my priorities, block time for deep work, and check in on progress from earlier tasks,” that’s someone who thinks like an owner.
3. “What does time tracking mean to you, and how do you feel about it in a work setup?”
This one is fun, because people have opinions.
Some associate it with control. Others see it as accountability.
I always explain:
“It’s not about monitoring you. It’s to help you understand where your time goes, and help me protect your workload. It’s about clarity, not control.”
If someone pushes back hard on this, it tells me they may struggle with transparency, or view structure as an attack on freedom.
Neither of those things work well in a fast-paced startup.
4. “When working in a team, what do you prefer: being trained with clear guidance, or figuring things out on your own with resources? Or a bit of both?”
This question is gold.
You learn very quickly who will need step-by-step directions… and who will say, “Point me in the right direction and I’ll figure it out.”
Look, there’s no shame in either preference.
But for a lean team that needs to move fast, I need people who are comfortable figuring things out without me walking them through every Google Doc.
5. “I understand that during your first few weeks you’d need guidance, and I’m totally fine with that. But how long do you think it will take for you to fully adjust?”
This tells me how self-aware they are about their ramp-up time.
If someone says, “I think I’d be fully comfortable by month 2,” that’s reasonable.
If they say, “Probably 6–9 months,”, and the role isn’t complex, I know that I’ll be micromanaging longer than I want to.
I don’t expect people to be perfect on Day 1.
But I do want people who plan to stand on their own feet by Day 30, 60, or 90, not Day 300.
Who Are the “Right” People to Avoid Micromanaging?
Here’s what I’m learning: the right hires share a few key traits.
1. They ask questions up front
High-quality team members don’t wait until the deadline is close to ask what “done” looks like.
They ask early. They clarify expectations. They want to understand, not just execute.
This avoids performance issues and missed deadlines, and it means you don’t have to coach every step. You can just set the goal and get out of the way.
2. They take ownership
People who take ownership over their work don’t wait for a task list. They create one.
They don’t “wait for the boss.” They act, and then update you along the way.
This kind of accountability builds trust. It also gives managers the breathing room to actually manage, not just babysit.
3. They communicate proactively
Open communication is huge. Not just when things are going well, but especially when they’re not.
People who wait until the last minute to say “I’m behind” make you want to micromanage.
People who say “Hey, I’m hitting a blocker, here’s what I’m doing about it” make you feel safe stepping back.
This level of proactive communication is just as critical when you’re working with difficult clients. It helps you stay ahead of issues and avoid misalignment before it snowballs.
4. They care about the outcome, not just the task
Some team members just want to cross things off a to-do list.
The right ones ask, “How is this impacting the bigger picture?” They think like owners.
They want high-quality work, not just “done” work.
That mindset shift alone can reduce a manager’s anxiety more than any productivity tool ever could.
Building Trust Isn’t Just About Letting Go, It’s About Alignment
To be clear: Yes, micromanagers need to learn to let go.
They need to set clear expectations, foster a culture of trust, and allow their employees to develop new skills and make mistakes.
But if your team isn’t aligned with your values, your pace, or your style of work… letting go just makes things worse.
Let’s be honest, you shouldn’t trust people who consistently don’t meet expectations.
You shouldn’t take a step back if stepping back means everything will fall apart.
That’s not poor leadership. That’s awareness.
Trust isn’t blind. It’s built.
Leadership Lessons (aka: What I Wish I Knew Earlier)
If you’re a startup founder, team lead, or anyone who’s been called a “micromanager” before, here are a few hard-earned lessons from my journey:
1. Micromanagement is exhausting (for everyone)
It erodes morale.
It stifles creativity.
It makes people feel like their work isn’t trusted even if the real reason is just repeated letdowns.
2. You can’t build a culture of trust without the right people
You can have all the good intentions in the world, but if your team members are not wired for autonomy, you’ll always feel like you’re dragging them uphill.
That’s not a management style problem. That’s a hiring problem.
3. Clear expectations are everything
Most micromanagement starts when expectations are fuzzy.
Define the goal. Define what “success” looks like. Define the why behind the task.
Then, get out of the way, unless they give you a reason not to.
4. Trust is earned on both sides
It’s not just about trusting your employees.
They have to earn your trust by showing they can handle things without supervision, communicate proactively, and consistently deliver.
Micromanagers often develop from a lack of trust. That lack doesn’t always come from nowhere.
Trust Is a Two-Way Street
I’m still figuring this out.
My new hires are starting soon, and I’ll update this article once I know if my new hiring approach worked.
But here’s what I know right now:
You don’t fix micromanagement by just “letting go” or “not caring as much.”
You fix it by finding people who get it.
People who don’t need you to hold their hand every step of the way.
People who want to learn and grow, not just be told what to do.
People who feel trusted, and act accordingly.
Until then, micromanagement isn’t just a leadership flaw.
It’s often the result of being the only one who truly cares about the outcome.
But once you find the right people?
You can finally breathe, delegate, and lead without micromanaging every detail.
What do you think?
Show comments / Leave a comment